Judging by Persuasiveness
My meta-debating position is pretty simple. I think debates should be judged based on how persuasive teams are. Persuasiveness is
Judging Non-Arguments
I've written that Persuasiveness = Truth*Importance*Originality(compared to 1st half). This is true, but it isn'
Against rational belief in free will
In Axiomatic Beliefs, I argue that certain premises are cornerstones of our thought and cannot be jettisoned or questioned. From
A non-additive view of morality.
Doing sums with morality is very dangerous. But, what is the alternative? The answer is to not look at the
Liberal Bias in Debating 1: Is there bias?
(Short Version)
* BP debating has a left wing bias in terms of which motions are set and which arguments are
Is immigration good for the economy?
Does killing one person of below average productivity boost GDP?
If not, then immigration must boost GDP.
(assuming no other
Debating to win.
“The primary thing when you take a sword in your hands is your intention to cut the enemy, whatever the
Rationality LifeHacks
Intentionally seek out information which contradicts your beliefs, Intentionally try to contradict your own beliefs. If your social circle agrees
A quick introduction to metaethics.
In science, we try to come up with the most general & simple rules possible which predict/resemble reality. In
Casuality and Determinism.
Determinism is the idea that the future is fixed. I believe that the universe is deterministic. I believe that, given