Things which don't exist don't add up.
In Nothing is Greater than the Sum of it's parts, I argue that emergent systems do not exist.
Only people have intentions.
Nothing is greater than the sum of it's parts.
The idea of an institution is an abstraction, a
Lying to oneself and to others
If you can lie to yourself, you don't have to lie to others.
If you can lie to
Rumor Mill 1
(Not my own opinions. Believe at your own risk)
President Francois Mitterrand was a nazi. He worked under the french
Debating to win
Debating is a game and, as with most games, there are a number of useful meta-strategic tricks which it pays
Judging by Persuasiveness
My meta-debating position is pretty simple. I think debates should be judged based on how persuasive teams are. Persuasiveness is
Judging Non-Arguments
I've written that Persuasiveness = Truth*Importance*Originality(compared to 1st half). This is true, but it isn'
Against rational belief in free will
In Axiomatic Beliefs, I argue that certain premises are cornerstones of our thought and cannot be jettisoned or questioned. From
A non-additive view of morality.
Doing sums with morality is very dangerous. But, what is the alternative? The answer is to not look at the
Liberal Bias in Debating 1: Is there bias?
(Short Version)
* BP debating has a left wing bias in terms of which motions are set and which arguments are